LatticeworkTHE EVIDENCE DESK

Signal Outcomes Lab

Which disclosed decisions held up after they became public?

We pool material 13F actions across managers, start the clock after disclosure, and observe each stock against SPY for 63 market sessions. This evaluates patterns—not personalities.

Complete outcomes
1,250
Direction supported
51.2%
Median vs SPY
+0.8 pts
Outcome window
63 sessions

Separate prospective register

Track evidence from the day we register it.

14 curated decisions registered from 2026-09-07. 0 complete windows, 13 tracking, 1 waiting for eligible closes. The historical results on this page do not count as prospective performance.

For each version, the clock starts strictly after both its source filing date and its recorded registration date. A correction preserves the previous source and observations, then restarts the revised claim's clock. Editorial selection and overlapping stock returns still prevent a claim of predictive validation.

Inspect a registered decision and its source versions →

Two products. Two different questions.

This is not another investor ranking.

Here · Signal Outcomes Lab

The unit is a decision.

NEW, ADD, TRIM, EXIT, reversal, agreement, or disagreement. The clock starts once the filing is public. Results are pooled across managers and direction-adjusted against SPY.

Elsewhere · Investor track records

The unit is a clone portfolio.

Each manager's disclosed portfolio is reconstructed, rebalanced quarterly, and compared with SPY over years. That asks whether a naive follower kept pace—not whether one filing action worked.

Compare investor track records →

Read the score correctly

One yardstick, normalized for direction.

NEW / ADD: positive means the stock beat SPY after disclosure.

TRIM / EXIT: positive means the stock lagged SPY after disclosure.

Complete: a full 63-market-session window, so rows are comparable.

Completed 63-session windows only

What happened after each action?

These cohorts separate the four observable filing actions. They do not infer the manager's trade price, intent, or undisclosed exposure.

New positions

Growing sample

A manager disclosed a stock that was absent from the prior filing.

Complete
139
Supported
43.9%
Median vs SPY
-2.3 pts

+22 still tracking

Additions

Broader sample

A manager increased an existing reported position materially.

Complete
410
Supported
43.9%
Median vs SPY
-1.3 pts

+84 still tracking

Trims

Broader sample

A manager reduced, but did not eliminate, a reported position.

Complete
542
Supported
53.7%
Median vs SPY
+1.8 pts

+97 still tracking

Exits

Broader sample

A reported position disappeared from the manager's next filing.

Complete
159
Supported
67.9%
Median vs SPY
+6.2 pts

+39 still tracking

Completed 63-session windows only

Did context change the signal?

These retrospective groups compare peer alignment and a manager's reported sequence. Same-quarter context can include filings published after the first manager disclosed, so it is not an available-at-first-disclosure trading signal. Sequence groups include every qualifying follow-on event in the eight-quarter window.

Same-side clusters

Growing sample

At least three material decisions on the same stock pointed in one direction that quarter.

Complete
103
Supported
59.2%
Median vs SPY
+6.8 pts

+14 still tracking

Split-quarter decisions

Broader sample

Tracked managers took material actions on both sides of the same stock in the same quarter.

Complete
1,061
Supported
50.6%
Median vs SPY
+0.3 pts

+216 still tracking

Reversals

Broader sample

A manager's next material action flipped from buying to selling, or vice versa.

Complete
329
Supported
55.9%
Median vs SPY
+2.8 pts

+80 still tracking

Continued builds

Growing sample

A buy-side material action followed an earlier buy-side action in the same stock.

Complete
147
Supported
39.5%
Median vs SPY
-1.8 pts

+37 still tracking

Continued reductions

Broader sample

A sell-side material action followed an earlier sell-side action in the same stock.

Complete
204
Supported
56.4%
Median vs SPY
+2.8 pts

+49 still tracking

Methodology and limits

Public-information clock. The measurement begins at the first market close after the filing became available—not at quarter end and not at an unknowable trade date.

Comparable primary sample. The table includes only completed 63-session observations. 242 newer decisions are still tracking; 0 do not yet have an observation window.

Material decisions only. NEW and EXIT qualify; ADD and TRIM require a 20% share change plus either 0.5% portfolio weight or $100M reported value.

Observation, not causation. The sample covers 8 reported quarters and a curated stock universe. Overlapping decisions can share the same stock return, so this is not a statistical claim of independence.

Selection rule. The 40 most widely owned mapped stocks in each archived prior quarter, plus the editorial Decision Ledger roster. Retrospective coverage: current manager membership and ticker mappings remain in use; archived holdings can include later amendments. This is not a fully point-in-time investable universe or a prospective test.

13F blind spots remain. Filings omit shorts, most derivatives, foreign listings, bonds, cash, exact trade dates, and the manager's thesis.

Fresh through Oct 2, 2026. Positive historical observations are research prompts, not forecasts or recommendations.